Australia’s 2018 World Cup bid over

Humiliating backdown or extraordinary coup? Australia has withdrawn its bid to host the World Cup in 2018 but did so after a week of key meetings and months of frenzied lobbying that look almost certain to deliver key support from European delegates for the nation’s bid in 2022.
Nanjing Night Net

This was a day in which you had to read between the lines to ascertain the real story.

What appeared at first a backdown – FFA Chairman Frank Lowy has long resisted pressure to depart the 2018 field and leave that tournament for Europe to fight over – ended as potentially the most important day in the two-year year history of Australia’s bid.

A clue to the political intrigue behind the decision came with its delivery. In an extraordinary move, governing body FIFA and the FFA put out a joint statement announcing Australia’s withdrawal and featuring glowing praise for the 2022 bid from FIFA president Sepp Blatter and chief executive Jerome Valcke.

The statement makes clear that the decision was reached ’’after several months of negotiation’’ including lengthy talks with European members of the 24-strong FIFA Executive Committee that will vote to award hosting rights in December.

“The FFA and my office as well as the FIFA president have been in constant dialogue about Australia’s bidding intentions since last autumn,” Valcke said.

“The FFA have displayed an exemplary level of solidarity with Europe and the European bidding nations and were among the very first to enter into an open and constructive dialogue with me after it became apparent that there was a growing movement to stage the 2018 World Cup in Europe.

“Their announcement of today therefore, to henceforth focus solely on bidding for the 2022 World Cup, is a welcome gesture that is much appreciated by FIFA’s leadership and Executive Committee.”

Europe has eight members on the executive committee. A total of thirteen votes are required to win hosting rights. Lowy made clear yesterday that negotiations for the 2018 exit have been ongoing since last October, and yet the FFA chairman has repeatedly refused to pull out in recent months, reiterating those comments as recently as Wednesday.

In reality, Australia – and much of the rest of the world – has long known the 2018 event would go to Europe. Lowy and bid chief Ben Buckley stayed in the race for both events in order to give themselves a bargaining chip. Now they have bargained.

They were determined not to do Europe’s bidding in exchange for nothing. Now they have done Europe’s bidding and are being roundly praised for it by very important men. It would be naive to believe that nothing was their price.

Lowy would say only that the decision had been taken “after careful consideration and analysis”. He did not say analysis of what.

While Lowy and Buckley both refuted talk of any vote-swapping deal there was a new sense of confidence coming from Australian headquarters, where there is a growing belief that Australia’s bid has never been in a stronger position.

The new spirit of bonhommie is entirely unofficial. Vote trading is strictly prohibited by FIFA. Officially every bid process is a good clean fight. And football’s canny politicians have never been above pledging support and not quite delivering it. But if proof were needed that relations have taken a turn for the better it was provided by one of the most influential Europeans of all.

Franz Beckenbauer – the World Cup winning player and coach known as “the Kaiser” declared earlier this week that Australia had a good chance of success and described the bid team as “extremely strong and extremely well prepared”.

As rival nations wooed the Executive Committee delegates at a closed “bid expo”, Beckenbauer, extremely influential among the European establishment and one of the eight executive committee members from that continent, was enthusiastically posing for photographs at the Australian stand with Sports Minister Kate Ellis.

Australia’s decision to pull out effectively sidelines its biggest rival for 2022, the United States – which is now left as the only non European bidder in a race including Spain/Portugal, England, The Netherlands/Belgium and Russia. With too many of the game’s decision makers determined to annex the 2018 tournament for Europe, the Americans have been left with diminished bargaining power.

The deal was finalised only in recent days as the 24 delegates gathered in Johannesburg for the FIFA congress and were subjected to frenzied hotel diplomacy and backroom lobbying of the eight European delegates in particular.

A key player was Peter Hargitay, the Europe-based consultant who operates on an exorbitant retainer from Australia but is considered an unrivalled networker among FIFA’s top layers. Hargitay and Lowy have both been prominent in meetings this week – including several with FIFA CEO and powerbroker Valcke.

Hargitay has also been lobbying European voting delegates for months, trying to win support for Australia over chief 2022 rivals Qatar and the USA. The recent turmoil in England’s bid has been extremely helpul for Australia’s cause.

Hargitay was previously an influential back room operator for England’s bid and was hired for that role by Geoff Thompson, England’s member on the FIFA Executive Committee and an old friend. When others, including Lord Treisman, were brought in to run the English bid, questions were raised about Hargitay’s colourful past and methods and the Hungarian-born gun for hire was sacked.

Relations were strained with England after Australia employed Hargitay but Triesman and several of his allies have departed the English bid after recently accusing the Spanish bid team of bribery and corruption.

Thompson – Hargitay’s original ally – has been newly installed as English bid chief. Suddenly, as Australia hopes realistically for strong European support, England is a key potential ally.

Australia has effectively ruled out the possibility of getting votes from three of the FIFA committee members, those from Qatar, Japan and Korea – all rival bidders. A single vote from Oceania has already been secured and much energy and attention has been put into wooing African delegates.

Focus will now shift to South America’s votes. That continent’s voters do not have a home bid to back as Brazil’s hosting of the 2014 Cup rules out a bid from that continent. South American committee members are widely expected to back the Spanish bid for 2018 but Australia will now woo them for 2022 – competing hard with their regional neighbour, the USA.

It could just be coincidence but word yesterday was that Lowy will soon visit several South American nations to press Australia’s case anew. After a flagging few months of stadium squabbles and lost momentum Australia is back in the game.

Stores, jobs to go at Clive Peeters

Clive Peeters in WarrnamboolThe receivers of collapsed retailer Clive Peeters will shut down six stores out of a total network of 44 locations as the business is prepared for sale. The closures will see the loss of 75 jobs.
Nanjing Night Net

Clive Peeters receiver, Phil Carter of insolvency specialists PPB, said this morning stores in Townsville, Ipswich (both Queensland), Mildura, Warrnambool (both Victoria), Bunbury and Canning Vale (both West Australia) will close at end of trade on Tuesday, June 15.

“The receivers, with the assistance of key management, conducted a review of individual store performance and identified these stores as unsustainable,” Mr Carter said.

“It is disappointing that these closures will result in job losses up to 75 out of a total of 1200 staff, but we have minimised the impact of this by redeploying employees into other stores as far as possible.”

Mr Carter announced that the receivers have now confirmed supply arrangements with over 20 of the major suppliers, including two of Clive Peeters’ largest suppliers, Panasonic and Electrolux.

He said a number of steps had also been taken to prepare the business for sale.

“We have experienced strong interest in the sale process and have requested submissions of non-binding offers by next Friday, 18 June. We then propose to deal with shortlisted parties only,” said Mr Carter.

He said the company will honour up to June 30 all remaining gift certificates at face value.

“Whilst we have no legal obligation to do so, we have agreed to honour gift certificates as a thank you to our loyal customers.”

Mr Carter and PPB partner Daniel Bryant were appointed Receivers and Managers of Clive Peeters on May 19.

It is believed Clive Peeters’ creditors include NAB which is owned $33 million.

[email protected]南京夜网.au

Mayor sought to override his council for land swap

THE Labor mayor of Fairfield and local MP, Nick Lalich, has lobbied the state government to allow a controversial land swap involving part of a public park and an ALP donor, council documents reveal.Despite a council resolution that property owned by the donor be compulsorily acquired, Cr Lalich asked the Planning Department to rezone part of Adam’s Reserve at Canley Vale so the council could swap a part for John Hui Zhang’s property next door.The rezoning, which the government had already rejected, would allow for a trade in which Mr Zhang’s new property would be worth an estimated $425,000 more than his present one. The council has been negotiating for seven years to acquire the block to build a road. But Mr Zhang wanted a land swap and refused an outright sale. After the rezoning was rejected last year by the previous planning minister, Kristina Keneally, the council resolved in February to compulsorily acquire the property.Cr Lalich, also the state member for Cabramatta, declared an interest and left the meeting before the resolution was considered. Several councillors, including two Labor ones, said they had considered council’s decision final.But Cr Lalich instructed the general manager, Alan Young, to urge the Planning Department to reconsider its decision not to rezone the park land.Cr Lalich said in a statement that the resolution to compulsorily acquire the land ”did not prohibit the making of a representation” on the rezoning.The property, at 61 Canley Vale Road, has been valued by the council at $875,000 but if the swap had been approved the owner would have obtained land worth an estimated $1.3 million.Cr Lalich denied his actions were designed to benefit Mr Zhang. He said a swap was preferable to forced acquisition and would cost less.”My preference for the land swap … is because the financial outcome to the ratepayers of my city is massively in their favour compared to the cost of only acquiring the property,” he said.Cr Lalich previously declared he had received a $1600 political donation from Mr Zhang and left council meetings when acquisition of the land was discussed.He did not deny the swap would have given a potential $425,000 benefit to the owner of 61 Canley Vale Road but said the May council meeting retrospectively endorsed his actions in pursuing the swap.Mr Young told the May council meeting he wrote to the department at the mayor’s request and in the belief that, despite the resolution on compulsory acquisition, the council still wanted the rezoning pursued.Mr Zhang declined to talk to the Herald yesterday.When the mayor’s actions were disclosed to the meeting in May, councillors resolved to reaffirm the compulsory acquisition and instructed Mr Young to withdraw the request to the Planning Department.A Planning spokesman confirmed that no action had been taken on the letters and the rezoning would not go ahead.
Nanjing Night Net

Death sentence for periodic detention

WEEKEND detention will be scrapped in NSW and replaced with a system of community-based treatment and monitoring orders in an overhaul designed to bring down recidivism rates.Magistrates and judges sentencing people convicted of crimes that attract less than two years’ jail will have the option of making an intensive correctional order, forcing them to undergo rehabilitation and education and complete a minimum of 32 hours a month of community service.A court would also be able to impose conditions such as a ban on drinking, curfews, travel restrictions, random breath tests and electronic monitoring with ankle bracelets.Offenders whose criminal behaviour is a result of gambling or alcohol addiction face having to wear monitoring devices for up to two years to ensure they avoid casinos or hotels.The orders would apply to motoring offences, speeding, drug offences and some assaults. Offenders have to be assessed as suitable for the program.If the orders are breached, the NSW Parole Authority will have the power to order the balance of the sentence be served in jail.The government expects about 750 people a year to be subject to the orders. The Premier, Kristina Keneally, said it was a tough approach.Since a review of periodic detention by the NSW Sentencing Council two years ago, the number of people sentenced to weekend detention has fallen.In 2007, nearly 1300 people served periodic detention, mostly for less than a year.Ms Keneally and the Attorney-General, John Hatzistergos, said the measure aimed to reduce re-offending by 10 per cent by 2016.Chris Cunneen, Professor of Criminology at James Cook University, said intensive correction orders were ”a good thing” if they were properly resourced, otherwise magistrates would be reluctant to use them.The government denies the move was a cost-cutting measure, arguing it would cost $14.5 million a year, compared with $11 million for periodic detention.The former chairman of the sentencing council, James Wood, QC, said yesterday he fully supported the move away from periodic detention, which was a flawed system.”At the very best, or very worst, periodic detention is a minor inconvenience,” he said.”What it does do is expose people to undesirable associations with other prisoners, other offenders, which can be taken advantage of back in the community. It also exposes them to new forms of criminality and new tricks. I just think it’s an inappropriate way of dealing with offenders, because it doesn’t address the factors that are causing them to offend. This is the key to this whole program: intensive treatment, retraining. Ways of addressing the factors that cause people to offend.”The deputy chief magistrate, Paul Cloran, also welcomed the proposal, which unlike periodic detention would be available outside Sydney, Newcastle and Wollongong. He said he hoped it would be further extended to the far west of NSW.But Denise Weelands, a lecturer at the University of Western Sydney, said she had concerns that strict conditions set many vulnerable people up to fail.
Nanjing Night Net

Scientists get chance to study what lies beneath

WASHINGTON: There are many uncertainties about the Deepwater Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. But the ability of scientists to identify oil from that event is not one of them.Oil ”fingerprinting” is sufficiently reliable that researchers should be able to say with confidence – both now and a year from now – whether a blob of oil floating in the water or washed up on shore came from the Deepwater Horizon blowout.”It is our statistical contention that each oil is unique,” said Wayne Gronlund, a one-time chemistry professor who runs the Coast Guard Marine Safety Laboratory in Connecticut, which is analysing dozens of samples from the gulf.”You never want to say something is 100 per cent, but we can pretty robustly argue that two oils are from the same source, or not,” said Christopher Reddy, a marine chemist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts.Petroleum consists of carbon atoms strung in chains, branches and rings, with many hydrogen atoms attached. It contains thousands of distinct chemical compounds. They range from simple ones that evaporate easily because they contain only a handful of carbon atoms, to behemoths that are not broken down by weather, sunlight and microbes and end up as heavy tar balls. Chemists can identify both the presence and quantity of hundreds of compounds using procedures called gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy. The ratio of one compound to another (with many compounds compared) is often enough to distinguish one oil sample from another.If the effects of time and the elements have changed those ratios in a way that makes a water-floating sample very different from a fresh-out-of-the-pipe one, scientists can turn to rare ”biomarkers” for help. Those are remnants of compounds that existed in the plants and animals that heat, pressure and time turned into oil. Many have a structure containing four carbon rings and are descended from cholesterol-like substances in cell walls.”The good thing is that these molecular fossils are pretty tough. They won’t be affected by the weathering and the environment,” Mr Reddy said.Oils from different fields – say, Saudi Arabia and Alaska – are radically different. But even oil from the same geographic area is distinguishable by source.After the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska, scientists detected oil in the sediments of Prince William Sound that was clearly different from what poured out of the grounded tanker. It turned out to be from natural petroleum seeps in the eastern Gulf of Alaska that currents had carried into the sound. In a paper published in 1996, a team of researchers reported that ”only about 15 per cent” of the oil in bottom sediments near oiled shorelines came from the spill.An unusual aspect of this spill is that samples on the surface have passed through 1500 metres of water before they are collected. That upward journey may extract many compounds from the crude, despite the truism that oil and water don’t mix. Scientists are interested in comparing samples collected at the pipe mouth, in underwater plumes, and on the surface.”Hopefully we’re going to learn a lot from this spill. This is a grand experiment,” Mr Reddy said.The Washington Post
Nanjing Night Net

Silent majority keeps quiet on aircraft noise

EVERY day, for about 10 years, Johann Heinrich has sent a fax. It goes to Airservices Australia, as well as the federal ministers Anthony Albanese and Peter Garrett, and documents the aircraft noise over his home that day.Mr Heinrich, 62, has lived in Summer Hill for 25 years with his wife and children.”It has been turned into a hell hole,” he said. He has suffered hearing loss, and says he experiences pain in his ears every time a plane goes overhead, as well as constant headaches.Mr Heinrich, who has a noise meter connected to his computer, is one of a handful of people responsible for most of Sydney’s aircraft noise complaints.In one month alone, six people in Summer Hill made 393 complaints to Airservices Australia. Two residents in Eastlakes made 343 complaints between them.A Senate hearing yesterday heard that nationally more than half the 24,000 noise complaints received last year were made by 20 people.The president of No Aircraft Noise, Allan Rees, said the Airservices Australia complaint line was ”just a sink for complaints”.”Most people give up complaining because nothing happens,” he said. But he said those determined to see change, or who are affected personally, would continue. ”I don’t think there’s anything sinister or outrageous about people continuing to complain,” he said.An Airservices Australia spokesman, Matt Wardell, said a few people regularly made multiple complaints. ”There are some significant aberrations in the stats,” he said.”Summer Hill’s always there because we have one or two individuals there who regularly make complaints.”But in Coogee, 22 people made 176 complaints, ”which arguably is more representative of some broader community concern,” he said.with AAP
Nanjing Night Net

Dubai connection exposed, but Keneally blocks secrets

IAN MACDONALD’S controversial trip to Dubai was organised by a company owned by the country’s ruler, Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, shortly after the disgraced former NSW minister made decisions benefiting the sheikh, who breeds racehorses in the Hunter Valley.However, key details of the trip – including emails between Mr Macdonald’s staff and the sheikh’s company – are being kept secret by the NSW government.The Premier, Kristina Keneally, refused to make key documents public and the head of the Department of Premier and Cabinet, Brendan O’Reilly, referred the report of his investigation to the Independent Commission Against Corruption.The report, released yesterday, finds Mr Macdonald and his deputy chief of staff, Jamie Gibson, spent almost $20,000 of taxpayer funds on airfares, meals and accommodation at the Le Royal Meridien Beach Resort and Spa in Dubai, also owned by the sheikh, against the orders of the then premier, Morris Iemma.It highlights a mysterious expense of $1594.67 charged to the hotel by Mr Gibson, for which he cannot account, and raises questions about an extra room booked by Mr Macdonald ”for no specific purpose”.The report was ordered by Ms Keneally after the Herald revealed Mr Macdonald, his wife and two friends were given upgrades on Emirates Airlines, also owned by the sheikh, shortly after Mr Macdonald made a decision to allow racehorse breeding to continue in NSW during the 2007 equine influenza outbreak. The Herald also revealed that the upgrades were requested by members of the Hunter Valley thoroughbred community.Among emails provided to investigators by Mr Gibson are some ”which appear to indicate” Mr Macdonald’s itinerary was organised through an employee of the Darley organisation, Emma Ridley.”Darley is a global racehorse-breeding operation belonging to [the sheikh],” the report notes. ”It operates horse-stud interests in the Hunter Valley.”Ms Ridley also organised hotel bookings for the visit, using details of Mr Gibson’s personal Visa card. When she was asked to provide the card’s expiry date, Ms Ridley opted to confirm the reservations against Darley’s ”credit facility”. However, the facility was never charged.The report concluded that Mr Macdonald – who quit Parliament this week over the affair – charged the taxpayer $2815.50 for his flight to Dubai without the authorisation of Mr Iemma. He also improperly spent thousands of dollars on meals for his wife, Anita Gylseth, a colleague, Nick Papallo, and his unnamed wife, and Mr Macdonald’s daughter, Sacha.However, Mr Macdonald told investigators he did not know the flight had been booked through the government travel company. This was backed up by his secretary, Selina Rainger, who said he had not asked her to charge the flight to the government.Mr Gibson told investigators he believed he was given permission by Mr Iemma to travel to Dubai at taxpayers’ expense. The report finds Mr Gibson ”had some grounds for his belief” – information provided to him by Adam Badenoch, Mr Macdonald’s then chief of staff who recalled a letter authorising the flight.However, Mr Iemma told investigators he had no recollection of the letter and it could not be found.Tabling the report in Parliament yesterday, Ms Keneally said Mr Macdonald’s resignation had been appropriate. ”Given the findings of the … report it was the proper course of action. Ian Macdonald would have had no option but to resign.”She said the Department of Premier and Cabinet would review Mr Gibson’s actions and would take disciplinary action if required.Ms Keneally said attachments to the report would not be released publicly. ”They are being reviewed by the ICAC and contain personal and private information of both public officials and private citizens.Last night, Mr Macdonald told Channel Nine that he was a victim of ”self-destructive” leaks within the Labor Party.He told the Herald: ”I have a clear conscience.”He said the trip was ”worthwhile” and any expenses outside of ministerial guidelines were taken mistakenly.He has repaid the cost of the flight and a portion of the cost of the meals.
Nanjing Night Net

Power play between China and India puts Sri Lanka on strategic map

NEW DELHI: India and Sri Lanka have signed a series of aid, economic and diplomatic deals, the latest move in an increasingly intense struggle between New Delhi and Beijing for influence over the island nation.The signing took place on the first day of a visit to the Indian capital by the Sri Lankan President, Mahinda Rajapaksa.The deals range from loans for big infrastructure projects, including the building of railways, to agreements to share electricity and boost cultural exchanges.Dubbed ”the new Great Game”, in reference to the strategic rivalry between Russia and Britain in Central Asia during the 19th century, the battle between China and India for primacy in the Indian Ocean is set to be one of the big themes of the coming decades, analysts say.Sri Lanka’s geographic position is its main draw.”China wants to be the pre-eminent power in Asia, and whether Asia ends up multipolar or unipolar will be determined by what happens in the Indian Ocean, ” said Brahma Chellaney, professor of strategic studies at the Centre for Policy Research in New Delhi.Most Indian assistance is focused on the north of Sri Lanka, dominated by ethnic Tamils and devastated by years of civil war between the government and Tamil separatists.New Delhi also announced the opening of consulates in the Tamil-dominated city of Jaffna and, significantly, in the southern town of Hambantota, where Chinese contractors are building a vast deep-water port in a project largely financed by Beijing’s lending arm, the Export-Import Bank.Indian strategists believe the port is a key link in a chain of such projects from Burma to Pakistan, the so-called string of pearls, which seeks to extend China’s maritime influence.Beijing has already embarked on a road-building program north of the Sri Lankan capital, Colombo, and is helping build a power station. A $US190 million ($225 million) loan to build an international airport in the south has also been agreed. In March, Sri Lanka said China was supplying more than half its construction and development loans.India’s plans in Sri Lanka are complicated by its own sizeable Tamil population, many of whom blame Mr Rajapaksa for high levels of Tamil civilian casualties in the final days of the civil war last year.Guardian News & Media
Nanjing Night Net

Nightclub boss on coke charge

THE owner of Canberra’s biggest gay nightclub, Cube, has been charged by NSW Police with conspiring with an alleged Kings Cross-based drug syndicate to sell cocaine in the ACT.Maurizio Rao was charged by Kings Cross drug squad detectives who met him and his lawyer at Queanbeyan police station on Tuesday.After being interviewed, the 34-year-old owner of the popular nightclub in Civic was charged with conspiring to supply an indictable quantity of cocaine.He was released on police bail to answer the charge in Downing Centre Local Court in Sydney on July 5.It is the second time Mr Rao has faced a major police investigation.In 2006 he was charged with murdering David Nato Seula, 23.Mr Seula died on August 4 of that year, three weeks after he was stabbed in a brawl with four of his friends, a Cube nightclub bouncer, Adam Street, and Mr Rao.In 2008, Mr Rao was found not guilty of murder and inflicting grievous bodily harm when Supreme Court Justice Malcolm Gray found he acted in self-defence after being attacked by Mr Seuala and his friends, who had been refused entry to the club because of their heavily intoxicated state.Witnesses said the five men had made threats against other patrons, vowing to “bash poofs” if they were not admitted to the club.Although Justice Gray rejected evidence that Mr Rao did not strike the fatal blow, he did accept that he had acted in self-defence.Last December Cube nightclub was the focus of local police criticism after they alleged an advertisement on its website was “highly inappropriate”.The ad showed a mirrored image of a woman’s open mouth with her teeth holding what appeared to be a tablet with a heart embossed on it.But the club owner rejected the criticism, saying the woman in the image was merely holding candy in her mouth.
Nanjing Night Net

O’Connor recalled to Wallabies starting XV

Queensland prop Ben Daley will face a baptism of fire in his Wallabies debut against England at Subiaco Oval on Saturday night.Daley, 21, will make his Test debut as one of four changes to Australia’s starting 15, which defeated Fiji 49-3 in Canberra last weekend.Hooker Saia Faingaa, fullback James O’Connor and winger Drew Mitchell have also been promoted by coach Robbie Deans.Dropping out of the side are front rowers Pekahou Cowan and Huia Edmonds, fullback Kurtley Beale and injured winger Adam Ashley-Cooper.Halfback Will Genia has overcome a knee injury to be a surprise choice on the bench behind Luke Burgess, while young prop James Slipper was also a bolter in the reserves.Daley and Slipper were not starting Super 14 players before this season, but have risen through the ranks on the back of the Reds Super 14 revival and Deans’s controversial youth policy.England are sure to target Australia’s scrum and heavily outweigh the Wallabies’ frontrow in experience and size.Between them, loose prop Daley, hooker Faingaa and tight head Salesi Ma’afu have just two Tests caps.England have only won twice against the Wallabies in Australia with both of their wins coming in 2003 when they won the Rugby World Cup.Despite scoring two tries against Fiji, Beale was replaced by the in-form O’Connor but remains on the bench where NSW teammate Berrick Barnes will also sit for his first Test of the season.15. James O’Connor (Western Force)14. Digby Ioane (Queensland Reds)13. Rob Horne (NSW Waratahs)12. Matt Giteau (Brumbies)11. Drew Mitchell (NSW Waratahs)10. Quade Cooper (Queensland Reds)9. Luke Burgess (NSW Waratahs)8. Richard Brown (Western Force)7. David Pocock (Western Force)6. Rocky Elsom (Brumbies, captain)5. Nathan Sharpe (Western Force)4. Dean Mumm (NSW Waratahs)3. Salesi Ma’afu (Brumbies)2. Saia Faingaa (Queensland Reds)1. Ben Daley (Queensland Reds)Reserves:16. Huia Edmonds (Brumbies)17. James Slipper (Queensland Reds)18. Mark Chisholm (Brumbies)19. Matt Hodgson (Western Force)20. Will Genia (Queensland Reds)21. Berrick Barnes (NSW Waratahs)22. Kurtley Beale (NSW Waratahs)AAP
Nanjing Night Net